|
Page 2 of 4
Of course, some of the suggestions for new questions were of
the
tongue-in-cheek variety. One writer for a South Carolina newspaper
suggested that the 1930 census "neglected to put in many questions that
the present age demands. . . . How much did you lose in the stock
market crash last fall? If you could live your life over, would you get
married? What is your average golf score? If single, how much do you
spend on girls a year? Are you a native born or naturalized Democrat?
How do you pronounce the name 'Aristide Briand?'"18
To make room for the new questions, the inquiries on the
mortgage
status of owned homes, date of naturalization, and native language of
mother and father were dropped, and two questions on the ability to
read and to write were combined into one.19
To alert the population to the coming census, the Census
Bureau began designing its publicity program in 1928.20
This program began with efforts to inform the public about the general
purpose for conducting the census as well as an explanation of the
types of questions to be asked. Such information came to the public
through a series of press releases and articles intended for
publication in newspapers and magazines. In federal buildings, a
presidential proclamation was distributed and displayed that stressed
each individual's duty to respond to all questions; informed people
that the census had no relationship to taxation, military conscription,
jury duty, or compulsory school attendance; and reminded respondents
that the information they provided would be held in strict confidence.
And with the final publication of the printed reports, over a year
after Census Day, the Census Bureau released a second set of press
releases designed to highlight and explain the significance of the
major findings of the census in both tables and text.
The Census Bureau, however, did not rely solely on the printed
media
to mobilize the public. Perhaps taking a cue from the "admen" of the
private sector, the Census Bureau worked to appeal to the public in a
variety of ways. In addition to asking local newspapers to announce the
names of those selected to be supervisors and enumerators, it sought
the cooperation of radio stations and movie theaters in promoting the
census. The Census Bureau also appealed to local chambers of commerce
and other community organizations to encourage the members of their
communities to complete the census.
Another useful resource for education, promotion of the
census, and
recruitment was in the schools. Beginning in late 1929, the Census
Bureau designed an outreach program aimed at the National Education
Association to urge teachers to explain the census to their students.
Students would then write an essay that they would take home to show
their parents. In addition, the Census Bureau encouraged teachers,
substitutes, and advanced students to become enumerators.
The Enumeration
The area covered by the 1930 census included the 48 states, the
District of Columbia, and the territories of Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, Panama Canal Zone, Guam,
and Samoa.21
Census Day for all areas was the same except in Alaska, where the
census was taken as of October 1, 1929, for "climatic" reasons.
Territories accounted for approximately 1,700 enumeration districts.22
The transition from preliminary planning and preparation to
early
census operations had begun by mid-1929, when the Census Bureau started
to identify candidates for the 575 census supervisor positions. The
agency received a waiver from civil service laws for the hiring of
supervisors and enumerators. This allowed the bureau to accept
applications from political referrals as well as those from people
without political credentials. Steuart reported that by June 1929,
bureau headquarters was receiving applications for supervisory
positions on a daily basis. Upon receiving an application, the agency
sent the inquirer the fifty-page supervisor's manual with a letter
asking him or her to read the manual and inform the agency if they were
still interested. Not surprisingly, some applicants withdrew their
applications upon finding out what the duties involved. Among other
responsibilities, each supervisor would be responsible for overseeing
the activities of an average of 170 enumerators.23
Applicants who survived this part of the process were sent an
application blank, a test census schedule, and a descriptive narrative
of a small population. They were to complete the application and the
census form with facts contained in the narrative and mail the formal
application package to bureau headquarters. There, agency officials
corrected the test and sent a photostat of the corrected version to the
applicant. If the person passed the test and could demonstrate having
had business training or other qualifications for supervisory work, he
or she was offered the position. Supervisors were expected to live in
or near the city in which the supervisor's office was established.
Thirty of the 575 supervisors appointed for 1930 were women.24
Once appointed, one of the supervisor's first responsibilities
was
to acquire office space and equipment, at no cost to the bureau
wherever possible. Supervisors were instructed to seek assistance from
the local Federal Business Administration and to request space, office
equipment, and furniture from federal, state, and municipal agencies
and from civic organizations such as chambers of commerce and boards of
trade. Success in these endeavors varied widely. More than half the
supervisors (346) were able to secure free office space, but less than
a quarter (141) got free office equipment. In the balance of the
offices, the agency was forced to rent space and rent or purchase the
necessary equipment and furniture.25
Census supervisors were delegated the authority to hire and
fire
enumerators. Initially, all applications for enumerator positions were
to be sent to bureau headquarters. Aspiring census takers were sent the
same test census form, instructions, and narrative mailed to
supervisors, as well as an application form, and asked to complete the
census schedule using the information in the narrative according to the
instructions. Enumerator packages were graded and corrected in
Washington, and those that passed were sent to the appropriate
supervisor. By March 1930, the number of enumerators needed and the
tight time schedules led to an updated procedure in which applicants
sent their completed packages directly to the supervisor's office,
where they were graded and corrected.
Bureau officials estimated that they would need about 100,000
enumerators to take the census. In the end, the agency hired 87,800
enumerators. Of the nearly 198,000 people who applied for these
positions, 157,000 were judged qualified.26
Enumeration districts in cities comprised an average of
eighteen
hundred people. Enumerators were expected to complete their work in the
two weeks from April 2 to April 15. For rural areas, enumerators
administered the agriculture census as well as the population census,
and the districts contained fewer people. But because the area covered
was much larger, rural enumerators were given four weeks to collect
their data.
Enumerator pay varied in different parts of the country but
was
usually four or five cents for each person enumerated and forty or
fifty cents for each farm. In exceptional circumstances, the rates went
as high as twenty cents a person and five dollars a farm. The goal was
to allow the average enumerator to earn between five and eight dollars
a day during the enumeration.27
In addition to overseeing the work of the enumerators, census
supervisors were also authorized to appoint an office staff. Usually
hired in February or March 1930, the office staff consisted of two
office supervisors, a stenographer, and up to ten clerical workers.
Supervisory personnel earned between $4.00 and $6.00 a day;
stenographers were paid $5.00 a day. Pay for clerical workers varied
between $2.50 and $4.00 a day but could reach as much as $10.00 a day.28
Any number of factors could contribute to delays. In some
parts of
the Southwest and the far West, enumeration districts encompassed more
than 150 square miles of rugged terrain. One enumerator working out of
Butte, Montana, said that he had ridden six hundred miles on horseback
between March 29 and April 23 in order to count the three hundred
people in his district.29
In neighborhoods heavily populated by immigrants, suspicion of
outsiders and the government in general made it virtually impossible
for anyone but a local resident to obtain complete and accurate
information. While the Census Bureau tried to hire locals in most
cases, it was not always possible. While 291 translators were hired to
assist with the enumeration, this was obviously an inadequate number
for a foreign-born population of 14.2 million people.30 Despite these difficulties, most of
the census data were collected within the time allotted.
After the office staff had reviewed the completed schedules
returned
by the enumerators, supervisors were told to release preliminary counts
for as many civil divisions areas in their districts as possible. By
mid-April, supervisors throughout the country had begun to release the
figures. Two months later, preliminary counts for 745 cities and towns
of 10,000 or more and for more than half the 3,098 counties had been
released.31
Local officials were anxious to have these figures, and a few even
complimented supervisors on the quality of the count in their areas.
For example, the mayor of Santa Cruz, California, wrote to the local
census supervisor to thank him for releasing the preliminary count for
his city, adding "Your work should be commended."32
The official count of state populations for the purpose of
apportionment were given to the secretary of commerce on November 17,
1930; he in turn sent them to President Hoover, who forwarded them to
the Congress on December 4.33
Data Tabulation and Publication
Following a clerical review in the district supervisor's
office,
completed census schedules were sent to Census Bureau headquarters in
Washington for further editing, coding, keying, and tabulation. Once
the schedules were received at headquarters, they were reviewed for
omissions and internal consistency. The next step in the process was
adding the codes for occupation, birthplace, language, and other
variables. Once the clerks supplied these codes, the schedules were
ready for keying.
The tabulation system required that two cards be punched for
each
person. One card carried all the information noted on the individual
census schedule, except age at marriage, which was included on the
family card. The second, a family card, included the composition and
characteristics of the family taken from the census schedule. A third
card, the unemployment card, was prepared for each person who was
usually employed but was not at work the day before the enumerator
conducted the interview.34
The Census Bureau employed about two thousand people and up to
2,225
punching and verifying machines to keypunch over 139 million cards for
the 1930 census of population.35
After keypunching, the cards were sent to be sorted and
tabulated by
machine. The sorting machines the bureau used could sort only one
column at a time. While some tabulations were run without prior
sorting, many of the card decks had to be sorted frequently to separate
the subsets of information needed for a particular table. Groups of
cards moved from the sorting machines to the tabulators.36
Unit counters (a kind of tabulating machine) added up the number of
people in a given geographic area who had the specific characteristics
called for in a particular table. Typical combinations included marital
status by sex and race, and literacy by age. The end product of each
tabulation run was a large sheet of paper with printed counts of the
number of people in each of several groups defined by their
characteristics. Each run covered a limited geographical area, such as
an enumeration district. To obtain publication data, the results of two
or more runs would be aggregated into publication geography, such as
counties, cities, and minor civil divisions. As Secretary of Commerce
Robert J. Lamont pointed out, each card had to be run through the
electric tabulating machines "a dozen times or more" to extract the
data presented in census publications.37 Nearly four thousand people worked
in the sorting and tabulation area during the height of the 1930 census.
|